Texas False Claims Act Medicaid Fraud Lawyer Handles Texas False Claims Act Lawsuits, Texas Medicaid Fraud Whistleblower Recovery Lawsuits, Texas Medicaid False Billing Whistleblower Award Lawsuits, Texas Medicaid Double Billing Fraud Lawsuits, Texas Medicaid Fraud False Billing Lawsuits, Texas Unnecessary Medical Treatment Relator Lawsuits, and Texas Medicaid Fraud Whistleblower Lawsuits by Texas False Claims Act Medicaid Fraud Lawyer Jason S. Coomer

The Texas False Claims Act is designed to prevent Medicaid Fraud including false Medicaid billing, fraudulent Medicaid billing, Medicaid kickbacks, billing Medicaid for patients that have died, and phantom Medicaid billing. The Act offers large financial rewards to whistleblowers that properly report instances of significant Medicaid fraud. If you are aware of Texas Medicaid kickbacks, Texas fraudulent Medicaid billing, or other Texas Medicaid fraud, and are the original source of information with special knowledge, and evidence of the fraud, please feel free to contact Texas False Claims Act Medicaid Fraud Whistleblower Recovery Lawyer Jason Coomer via e-mail message or use our submission form.

Texas Medicaid Whistleblowers with Original and Specialized Information of Medicaid Fraud Are Eligible to Collect Large Financial Rewards for Filing Texas False Claims Act Lawsuits, Texas Medicaid Fraud Whistleblower Recovery Lawsuits, Texas Medicaid False Billing Whistleblower Award Lawsuits, Texas Medicaid Double Billing Fraud Lawsuits, Texas Medicaid Fraud False Billing Lawsuits, Texas Unnecessary Medical Treatment Relator Lawsuits, and Texas Medicaid Fraud Whistleblower Lawsuits

Medical professionals as insiders with original and specialized information of Medicaid fraud are needed to step forward to help expose and prevent Medicaid fraud. As such, the state of Texas has enacted Whistleblower Reward laws that provide economic incentives for Texas Medicaid Fraud Whistleblowers with original and specialized information of Medicaid fraud and Medicaid kickbacks. With the help of a Texas Medicaid fraud lawyer, these Texas Medicaid fraud whistleblowers can help expose and prevent Medicaid fraud, as well as can also recover a portion of the money collected from the fraudulent health care providers.

With the enactment of these Texas Whistleblower Reward laws, it is becoming more common for Texas Dentist Medicaid Fraud Whistleblowers, Medical Clinic Medicaid Fraud Whistleblowers, Texas Hospital CEO Whistleblowers, Texas Hospital System CFO Whistleblowers, Texas Benefit Coordinator Whistleblowers, Texas Health Care Book Keeper Whistleblowers, and other Texas Medicaid Fraud Whistleblowers to come forward and expose Medicaid Fraud and fraudulent billing schemes.

Texas False Claims Act Lawsuit, Texas Medicaid Fraud Whistleblower Recovery Lawsuit, Texas Medicaid False Billing Whistleblower Award Lawsuit, Texas Medicaid Double Billing Fraud Lawsuit, Texas Medicaid Fraud False Billing Lawsuit, Texas Unnecessary Medical Treatment Relator Lawsuit, and Texas Medicaid Fraud Whistleblower Lawsuit Information

Medicaid is a federal/state cost-sharing program that provides health care to people who are unable to pay for such care. In Texas, the Medicaid program is administered by the Texas Health and Human Services Commission. More than 3.7 million Texans are eligible for Medicaid, and there are more than 57,000 active Medicaid providers. A provider can be any person, group of people, or health care facility that supplies medical services to Medicaid recipients. Providers include doctors, medical equipment companies, podiatrists, dentists, licensed professional counselors, hospitals, adult day care centers, nursing homes, clinics, pharmacies, ambulance companies, case management centers and others.

The Texas Medicaid program costs about $30 Billion each year and is expected to continue to increase in the future. Of this cost, it is estimated that Medicaid fraud costs are between Two Billion Dollars ($2,000,000,000.00) to Four Billion Dollars ($4,000,000,000.00) each year.

There are many types of Medicaid fraud including:

billing Medicaid for X-rays, blood tests and other procedures that were never performed
falsifying a patient’s diagnosis to justify unnecessary tests;
giving a patient a generic drug and billing for the name-brand version of the medication;
giving a recipient a motorized scooter and billing for an electric wheelchair, which can cost three times more;
billing Medicaid for care not given;
billing Medicaid for patients who have died or who are no longer eligible for Medicaid;
billing Medicaid for care given to patients who have transferred to another facility;
transporting Medicaid patients by ambulance when it is not medically necessary;
requiring vendors to “kick back” part of the money they receive for rendering services to Medicaid patients (kickbacks may also include vacations, merchandise, etc.);
billing patients for services already paid for by Medicaid;
billing Medicaid for phantom patients;
double billing Medicaid for services;
upcoding services for increased Medicaid payments.

Medicaid fraud violates federal and state criminal laws and can result in significant fines and/or incarceration. Those convicted of fraud may also lose their status as Medicaid providers. To prevent Medicaid fraud, Texas has enacted the Texas False Claims Act and Medicaid Fraud Prevention Act.

HUMAN RESOURCES CODE
TITLE 2. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES AND DEPARTMENT OF PROTECTIVE AND REGULATORY SERVICES
SUBTITLE C. ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS
CHAPTER 36. MEDICAID FRAUD PREVENTION

SUBCHAPTER A. GENERAL PROVISIONS

Sec. 36.001. DEFINITIONS. In this chapter:

(1) "Claim" means a written or electronically submitted request or demand that:
(A) is signed by a provider or a fiscal agent and that identifies a product or service provided or purported to have been provided to a Medicaid recipient as reimbursable under the Medicaid program, without regard to whether the money that is requested or demanded is paid; or
(B) states the income earned or expense incurred by a provider in providing a product or a service and that is used to determine a rate of payment under the Medicaid program.

(2) "Documentary material" means a record, document, or other tangible item of any form, including:
   (A) a medical document or X ray prepared by a person in relation to the provision or purported provision of a product or service to a Medicaid recipient;
   (B) a medical, professional, or business record relating to:
        (i) the provision of a product or service to a Medicaid recipient; or
        (ii) a rate or amount paid or claimed for a product or service, including a record relating to a product or service provided to a person other than a Medicaid recipient as needed to verify the rate or amount;
   (C) a record required to be kept by an agency that regulates health care providers;
    or
   (D) a record necessary to disclose the extent of services a provider furnishes to Medicaid recipients.

(3) "Fiscal agent" means:
   (A) a person who, through a contractual relationship with the Texas Department of Human Services, the Texas Department of Health, or another state agency, receives, processes, and pays a claim under the Medicaid program; or
   (B) the designated agent of a person described by Paragraph (A).

(4) "Health care practitioner" means a dentist, podiatrist, psychologist, physical therapist, chiropractor, registered nurse, or other provider licensed to provide health care services in this state.

(5) "Managed care organization" has the meaning assigned by Section 32.039(a).

(6) "Medicaid program" means the state Medicaid program.

(7) "Medicaid recipient" means an individual on whose behalf a person claims or receives a payment from the Medicaid program or a fiscal agent, without regard to whether the individual was eligible for benefits under the Medicaid program.

(8) "Physician" means a physician licensed to practice medicine in this state.

(9) "Provider" means a person who participates in or who has applied to participate in the Medicaid program as a supplier of a product or service and includes:
   (A) a management company that manages, operates, or controls another provider;
   (B) a person, including a medical vendor, that provides a product or service to a provider or to a fiscal agent;
   (C) an employee of a provider;
   (D) a managed care organization; and
   (E) a manufacturer or distributor of a product for which the Medicaid program provides reimbursement.

(10) "Service" includes care or treatment of a Medicaid recipient.

(11) "Signed" means to have affixed a signature directly or indirectly by means of handwriting, typewriting, signature stamp, computer impulse, or other means recognized by law.

(12) "Unlawful act" means an act declared to be unlawful under Section 36.002.
Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 824, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1995. Amended by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 1153, Sec. 4.02, eff. Sept. 1, 1997.
Amended by:
Acts 2005, 79th Leg., Ch. 806, Sec. 1, eff. September 1, 2005.

Sec. 36.0011. CULPABLE MENTAL STATE.

(a) For purposes of this chapter, a person acts "knowingly" with respect to information if the person:

(1) has knowledge of the information;

(2) acts with conscious indifference to the truth or falsity of the information; or

(3) acts in reckless disregard of the truth or falsity of the information.
(b) Proof of the person's specific intent to commit an unlawful act under Section 36.002 is not required in a civil or administrative proceeding to show that a person acted "knowingly" with respect to information under this chapter.
Added by Acts 2005, 79th Leg., Ch. 806, Sec. 2, eff. September 1, 2005.

Sec. 36.002. UNLAWFUL ACTS.

A person commits an unlawful act if the person:

(1) knowingly makes or causes to be made a false statement or misrepresentation of a material fact to permit a person to receive a benefit or payment under the Medicaid program that is not authorized or that is greater than the benefit or payment that is authorized;

(2) knowingly conceals or fails to disclose information that permits a person to receive a benefit or payment under the Medicaid program that is not authorized or that is greater than the benefit or payment that is authorized;

(3) knowingly applies for and receives a benefit or payment on behalf of another person under the Medicaid program and converts any part of the benefit or payment to a use other than for the benefit of the person on whose behalf it was received;

(4) knowingly makes, causes to be made, induces, or seeks to induce the making of a false statement or misrepresentation of material fact concerning:
   (A) the conditions or operation of a facility in order that the facility may qualify for certification or recertification required by the Medicaid program, including certification or recertification as:
      (i) a hospital;
      (ii) a nursing facility or skilled nursing facility;
      (iii) a hospice;
      (iv) an intermediate care facility for the mentally retarded;
      (v) an assisted living facility; or
      (vi) a home health agency; or
   (B) information required to be provided by a federal or state law, rule, regulation, or provider agreement pertaining to the Medicaid program;

(5) except as authorized under the Medicaid program, knowingly pays, charges, solicits, accepts, or receives, in addition to an amount paid under the Medicaid program, a gift, money, a donation, or other consideration as a condition to the provision of a service or product or the continued provision of a service or product if the cost of the service or product is paid for, in whole or in part, under the Medicaid program;

(6) knowingly presents or causes to be presented a claim for payment under the Medicaid program for a product provided or a service rendered by a person who:
   (A) is not licensed to provide the product or render the service, if a license is required; or
   (B) is not licensed in the manner claimed;

(7) knowingly makes a claim under the Medicaid program for:
   (A) a service or product that has not been approved or acquiesced in by a treating physician or health care practitioner;
   (B) a service or product that is substantially inadequate or inappropriate when compared to generally recognized standards within the particular discipline or within the health care industry; or
   (C) a product that has been adulterated, debased, mislabeled, or that is otherwise inappropriate;

(8) makes a claim under the Medicaid program and knowingly fails to indicate the type of license and the identification number of the licensed health care provider who actually provided the service;

(9) knowingly enters into an agreement, combination, or conspiracy to defraud the state by obtaining or aiding another person in obtaining an unauthorized payment or benefit from the Medicaid program or a fiscal agent;

(10) is a managed care organization that contracts with the Health and Human Services Commission or other state agency to provide or arrange to provide health care benefits or services to individuals eligible under the Medicaid program and knowingly:
   (A) fails to provide to an individual a health care benefit or service that the organization is required to provide under the contract;
   (B) fails to provide to the commission or appropriate state agency information required to be provided by law, commission or agency rule, or contractual provision; or
   (C) engages in a fraudulent activity in connection with the enrollment of an individual eligible under the Medicaid program in the organization's managed care plan or in connection with marketing the organization's services to an individual eligible under the Medicaid program;

(11) knowingly obstructs an investigation by the attorney general of an alleged unlawful act under this section;

(12) knowingly makes, uses, or causes the making or use of a false record or statement to conceal, avoid, or decrease an obligation to pay or transmit money or property to this state under the Medicaid program; or

(13) knowingly engages in conduct that constitutes a violation under Section 32.039(b).
Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 824, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1995. Amended by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 1153, Sec. 4.03, eff. Sept. 1, 1997; Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 233, Sec. 4, eff. Sept. 1, 1999.
Amended by:
Acts 2005, 79th Leg., Ch. 806, Sec. 3, eff. September 1, 2005.
Acts 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., Ch. 78, Sec. 1, eff. September 1, 2007.

Sec. 36.003. DOCUMENTARY MATERIAL IN POSSESSION OF STATE AGENCY.

(a) A state agency, including the Health and Human Services Commission, the Texas Department of Human Services, the Texas Department of Health, the Texas Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation, or the Department of Protective and Regulatory Services, shall provide the attorney general access to all documentary materials of persons and Medicaid recipients under the Medicaid program to which that agency has access. Documentary material provided under this subsection is provided to permit investigation of an alleged unlawful act or for use or potential use in an administrative or judicial proceeding.
(b) Except as ordered by a court for good cause shown, the office of the attorney general may not produce for inspection or copying or otherwise disclose the contents of documentary material obtained under this section to a person other than:
(1) an employee of the attorney general;
(2) an agency of this state, the United States, or another state;
(3) a criminal district attorney, district attorney, or county attorney of this state;
(4) the United States attorney general;
(5) a state or federal grand jury;
(6) a political subdivision of this state; or
(7) a person authorized by the attorney general to receive the information.
Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 824, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1995. Renumbered from Human Resources Code Sec. 36.007 by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 1153, Sec. 4.01(a), eff. Sept. 1, 1997.
Amended by:
Acts 2005, 79th Leg., Ch. 806, Sec. 4, eff. September 1, 2005.

Sec. 36.004. IMMUNITY.

Notwithstanding any other law, a person is not civilly or criminally liable for providing access to documentary material under this chapter to:
(1) an employee of the attorney general;
(2) an agency of this state, the United States, or another state;
(3) a criminal district attorney, district attorney, or county attorney of this state;
(4) the United States attorney general;
(5) a state or federal grand jury;
(6) a political subdivision of this state; or
(7) a person authorized by the attorney general to receive the information.
Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 824, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1995. Renumbered from Human Resources Code Sec. 36.008 by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 1153, Sec. 4.01(a), eff. Sept. 1, 1997.
Amended by:
Acts 2005, 79th Leg., Ch. 806, Sec. 5, eff. September 1, 2005.

Sec. 36.005. SUSPENSION OR REVOCATION OF AGREEMENT; PROFESSIONAL DISCIPLINE.

(a) A health and human services agency, as defined by Section 531.001, Government Code:
(1) shall suspend or revoke:
(A) a provider agreement between the agency and a person, other than a person who operates a nursing facility or an ICF-MR facility, found liable under Section 36.052; and
(B) a permit, license, or certification granted by the agency to a person, other than a person who operates a nursing facility or an ICF-MR facility, found liable under Section 36.052; and
(2) may suspend or revoke:
(A) a provider agreement between the agency and a person who operates a nursing facility or an ICF-MR facility and who is found liable under Section 36.052; or
(B) a permit, license, or certification granted by the agency to a person who operates a nursing facility or an ICF-MR facility and who is found liable under Section 36.052.
(b) A provider found liable under Section 36.052 for an unlawful act may not, for a period of 10 years, provide or arrange to provide health care services under the Medicaid program or supply or sell, directly or indirectly, a product to or under the Medicaid program. The executive commissioner of the Health and Human Services Commission may by rule:
(1) provide for a period of ineligibility longer than 10 years; or
(2) grant a provider a full or partial exemption from the period of ineligibility required by this subsection if the executive commissioner finds that enforcement of the full period of ineligibility is harmful to the Medicaid program or a beneficiary of the program.
(b-1) The period of ineligibility begins on the date on which the determination that the provider is liable becomes final.
(b-2) Subsections (b) and (b-1) do not apply to a provider who operates a nursing facility or an ICF-MR facility.
(c) A person licensed by a state regulatory agency who commits an unlawful act is subject to professional discipline under the applicable licensing law or rules adopted under that law.
(d) For purposes of this section, a person is considered to have been found liable under Section 36.052 if the person is found liable in an action brought under Subchapter C.
Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 824, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1995. Renumbered from Human Resources Code Sec. 36.009 by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 1153, Sec. 4.01(a), eff. Sept. 1, 1997. Amended by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 1153, Sec. 4.06, eff. Sept. 1, 1997.
Amended by:
Acts 2005, 79th Leg., Ch. 806, Sec. 6, eff. September 1, 2005.

Sec. 36.006. APPLICATION OF OTHER LAW.

The application of a civil remedy under this chapter does not preclude the application of another common law, statutory, or regulatory remedy, except that a person may not be liable for a civil remedy under this chapter and civil damages or a penalty under Section 32.039 if the civil remedy and civil damages or penalty are assessed for the same act.
Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 824, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1995. Renumbered from Human Resources Code Sec. 36.010 by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 1153, Sec. 4.01(a), eff. Sept. 1, 1997.

Sec. 36.007. RECOVERY OF COSTS, FEES, AND EXPENSES.

The attorney general may recover fees, expenses, and costs reasonably incurred in obtaining injunctive relief or civil remedies or in conducting investigations under this chapter, including court costs, reasonable attorney's fees, witness fees, and deposition fees.
Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 824, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1995. Renumbered from Human Resources Code Sec. 36.011 by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 1153, Sec. 4.01(a), eff. Sept. 1, 1997.

Sec. 36.008. USE OF MONEY RECOVERED.

The legislature, in appropriating money recovered under this chapter, shall consider the requirements of the attorney general and other affected state agencies in investigating Medicaid fraud and enforcing this chapter.
Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 824, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1995. Renumbered from Human Resources Code Sec. 36.012 by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 1153, Sec. 4.01(a), eff. Sept. 1, 1997.

SUBCHAPTER B. ACTION BY ATTORNEY GENERAL

Sec. 36.051. INJUNCTIVE RELIEF.

(a) If the attorney general has reason to believe that a person is committing, has committed, or is about to commit an unlawful act, the attorney general may institute an action for an appropriate order to restrain the person from committing or continuing to commit the act.
(b) An action under this section shall be brought in a district court of Travis County or of a county in which any part of the unlawful act occurred, is occurring, or is about to occur.
Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 824, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1995. Renumbered from Human Resources Code Sec. 36.003 by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 1153, Sec. 4.01(b), eff. Sept. 1, 1997.

Sec. 36.052. CIVIL REMEDIES.

(a) Except as provided by Subsection (c), a person who commits an unlawful act is liable to the state for:
(1) the amount of any payment or the value of any monetary or in-kind benefit provided under the Medicaid program, directly or indirectly, as a result of the unlawful act, including any payment made to a third party;
(2) interest on the amount of the payment or the value of the benefit described by Subdivision (1) at the prejudgment interest rate in effect on the day the payment or benefit was received or paid, for the period from the date the benefit was received or paid to the date that the state recovers the amount of the payment or value of the benefit;
(3) a civil penalty of:
(A) not less than $5,000 or more than $15,000 for each unlawful act committed by the person that results in injury to an elderly person, as defined by Section 48.002(a)(1), a disabled person, as defined by Section 48.002(a)(8)(A), or a person younger than 18 years of age; or
(B) not less than $5,000 or more than $10,000 for each unlawful act committed by the person that does not result in injury to a person described by Paragraph (A); and
(4) two times the amount of the payment or the value of the benefit described by Subdivision (1).
(b) In determining the amount of the civil penalty described by Subsection (a)(3), the trier of fact shall consider:
(1) whether the person has previously violated the provisions of this chapter;
(2) the seriousness of the unlawful act committed by the person, including the nature, circumstances, extent, and gravity of the unlawful act;
(3) whether the health and safety of the public or an individual was threatened by the unlawful act;
(4) whether the person acted in bad faith when the person engaged in the conduct that formed the basis of the unlawful act; and
(5) the amount necessary to deter future unlawful acts.
(c) The trier of fact may assess a total of not more than two times the amount of a payment or the value of a benefit described by Subsection (a)(1) if the trier of fact finds that:
(1) the person furnished the attorney general with all information known to the person about the unlawful act not later than the 30th day after the date on which the person first obtained the information; and
(2) at the time the person furnished all the information to the attorney general, the attorney general had not yet begun an investigation under this chapter.
(d) An action under this section shall be brought in Travis County or in a county in which any part of the unlawful act occurred.
(e) The attorney general may:
(1) bring an action for civil remedies under this section together with a suit for injunctive relief under Section 36.051; or
(2) institute an action for civil remedies independently of an action for injunctive relief.
Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 824, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1995. Renumbered from Human Resources Code Sec. 36.004 by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 1153, Sec. 4.01(b), eff. Sept. 1, 1997. Amended by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 1153, Sec. 4.04, eff. Sept. 1, 1997.
Amended by:
Acts 2005, 79th Leg., Ch. 806, Sec. 7, eff. September 1, 2005.
Acts 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., Ch. 29, Sec. 1, eff. May 4, 2007.

Sec. 36.053. INVESTIGATION.

(a) The attorney general may take action under Subsection (b) if the attorney general has reason to believe that:
(1) a person has information or custody or control of documentary material relevant to the subject matter of an investigation of an alleged unlawful act;
(2) a person is committing, has committed, or is about to commit an unlawful act; or
(3) it is in the public interest to conduct an investigation to ascertain whether a person is committing, has committed, or is about to commit an unlawful act.
(b) In investigating an unlawful act, the attorney general may:
(1) require the person to file on a prescribed form a statement in writing, under oath or affirmation, as to all the facts and circumstances concerning the alleged unlawful act and other information considered necessary by the attorney general;
(2) examine under oath a person in connection with the alleged unlawful act; and
(3) execute in writing and serve on the person a civil investigative demand requiring the person to produce the documentary material and permit inspection and copying of the material under Section 36.054.
(c) The office of the attorney general may not release or disclose information that is obtained under Subsection (b)(1) or (2) or any documentary material or other record derived from the information except:
(1) by court order for good cause shown;
(2) with the consent of the person who provided the information;
(3) to an employee of the attorney general;
(4) to an agency of this state, the United States, or another state;
(5) to any attorney representing the state under Section 36.055 or in a civil action brought under Subchapter C;
(6) to a political subdivision of this state; or
(7) to a person authorized by the attorney general to receive the information.
(d) The attorney general may use documentary material derived from information obtained under Subsection (b)(1) or (2), or copies of that material, as the attorney general determines necessary in the enforcement of this chapter, including presentation before a court.
(e) If a person fails to file a statement as required by Subsection (b)(1) or fails to submit to an examination as required by Subsection (b)(2), the attorney general may file in a district court of Travis County a petition for an order to compel the person to file the statement or submit to the examination within a period stated by court order. Failure to comply with an order entered under this subsection is punishable as contempt.
(f) An order issued by a district court under this section is subject to appeal to the supreme court.
Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 824, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1995. Renumbered from Human Resources Code Sec. 36.005 by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 1153, Sec. 4.01(b), eff. Sept. 1, 1997. Amended by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 1153, Sec. 4.05, eff. Sept. 1, 1997.
Amended by:
Acts 2005, 79th Leg., Ch. 806, Sec. 8, eff. September 1, 2005.

Sec. 36.054. CIVIL INVESTIGATIVE DEMAND.

(a) An investigative demand must:
(1) state the rule or statute under which the alleged unlawful act is being investigated and the general subject matter of the investigation;
(2) describe the class or classes of documentary material to be produced with reasonable specificity to fairly indicate the documentary material demanded;
(3) prescribe a return date within which the documentary material is to be produced; and
(4) identify an authorized employee of the attorney general to whom the documentary material is to be made available for inspection and copying.
(b) A civil investigative demand may require disclosure of any documentary material that is discoverable under the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.
(c) Service of an investigative demand may be made by:
(1) delivering an executed copy of the demand to the person to be served or to a partner, an officer, or an agent authorized by appointment or by law to receive service of process on behalf of that person;
(2) delivering an executed copy of the demand to the principal place of business in this state of the person to be served; or
(3) mailing by registered or certified mail an executed copy of the demand addressed to the person to be served at the person's principal place of business in this state or, if the person has no place of business in this state, to a person's principal office or place of business.
(d) Documentary material demanded under this section shall be produced for inspection and copying during normal business hours at the office of the attorney general or as agreed by the person served and the attorney general.
(e) The office of the attorney general may not produce for inspection or copying or otherwise disclose the contents of documentary material obtained under this section except:
(1) by court order for good cause shown;
(2) with the consent of the person who produced the information;
(3) to an employee of the attorney general;
(4) to an agency of this state, the United States, or another state;
(5) to any attorney representing the state under Section 36.055 or in a civil action brought under Subchapter C;
(6) to a political subdivision of this state; or
(7) to a person authorized by the attorney general to receive the information.
(e-1) The attorney general shall prescribe reasonable terms and conditions allowing the documentary material to be available for inspection and copying by the person who produced the material or by an authorized representative of that person. The attorney general may use the documentary material or copies of it as the attorney general determines necessary in the enforcement of this chapter, including presentation before a court.
(f) A person may file a petition, stating good cause, to extend the return date for the demand or to modify or set aside the demand. A petition under this section shall be filed in a district court of Travis County and must be filed before the earlier of:
(1) the return date specified in the demand; or
(2) the 20th day after the date the demand is served.
(g) Except as provided by court order, a person on whom a demand has been served under this section shall comply with the terms of an investigative demand.
(h) A person who has committed an unlawful act in relation to the Medicaid program in this state has submitted to the jurisdiction of this state and personal service of an investigative demand under this section may be made on the person outside of this state.
(i) This section does not limit the authority of the attorney general to conduct investigations or to access a person's documentary materials or other information under another state or federal law, the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, or the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
(j) If a person fails to comply with an investigative demand, or if copying and reproduction of the documentary material demanded cannot be satisfactorily accomplished and the person refuses to surrender the documentary material, the attorney general may file in a district court of Travis County a petition for an order to enforce the investigative demand.
(k) If a petition is filed under Subsection (j), the court may determine the matter presented and may enter an order to implement this section.
(l) Failure to comply with a final order entered under Subsection (k) is punishable by contempt.
(m) A final order issued by a district court under Subsection (k) is subject to appeal to the supreme court.
Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 824, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1995. Renumbered from Human Resources Code Sec. 36.006 by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 1153, Sec. 4.01(b), eff. Sept. 1, 1997.
Amended by:
Acts 2005, 79th Leg., Ch. 806, Sec. 9, eff. September 1, 2005.

Sec. 36.055. ATTORNEY GENERAL AS RELATOR IN FEDERAL ACTION.

To the extent permitted by 31 U.S.C. Sections 3729-3733, the attorney general may bring an action as relator under 31 U.S.C. Section 3730 with respect to an act in connection with the Medicaid program for which a person may be held liable under 31 U.S.C. Section 3729. The attorney general may contract with a private attorney to represent the state under this section.
Added by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 1153, Sec. 4.07(a), eff. Sept. 1, 1997.

SUBCHAPTER C. ACTION BY PRIVATE PERSONS

Sec. 36.101. ACTION BY PRIVATE PERSON AUTHORIZED.

(a) A person may bring a civil action for a violation of Section 36.002 for the person and for the state. The action shall be brought in the name of the person and of the state.
(b) In an action brought under this subchapter, a person who violates Section 36.002 is liable as provided by Section 36.052.
Added by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 1153, Sec. 4.08, eff. Sept. 1, 1997.

Sec. 36.102. INITIATION OF ACTION.

(a) A person bringing an action under this subchapter shall serve a copy of the petition and a written disclosure of substantially all material evidence and information the person possesses on the attorney general in compliance with the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.
(b) The petition shall be filed in camera and, except as provided by Subsection (c-1) or (d), shall remain under seal until at least the 180th day after the date the petition is filed or the date on which the state elects to intervene, whichever is earlier. The petition may not be served on the defendant until the court orders service on the defendant.
(c) The state may elect to intervene and proceed with the action not later than the 180th day after the date the attorney general receives the petition and the material evidence and information.
(c-1) At the time the state intervenes, the attorney general may file a motion with the court requesting that the petition remain under seal for an extended period.
(d) The state may, for good cause shown, move the court to extend the 180-day deadline under Subsection (b) or (c). A motion under this subsection may be supported by affidavits or other submissions in camera.
(e) An action under this subchapter may be dismissed before the end of the period during which the petition remains under seal only if the court and the attorney general consent in writing to the dismissal and state their reasons for consenting.
Added by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 1153, Sec. 4.08, eff. Sept. 1, 1997.
Amended by:
Acts 2005, 79th Leg., Ch. 806, Sec. 10, eff. September 1, 2005.

Sec. 36.1021. STANDARD OF PROOF.

In an action under this subchapter, the state or person bringing the action must establish each element of the action, including damages, by a preponderance of the evidence.
Added by Acts 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., Ch. 29, Sec. 2, eff. May 4, 2007.

Sec. 36.103. ANSWER BY DEFENDANT.

A defendant is not required to file in accordance with the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure an answer to a petition filed under this subchapter until the petition is unsealed and served on the defendant.
Added by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 1153, Sec. 4.08, eff. Sept. 1, 1997.
Amended by:
Acts 2005, 79th Leg., Ch. 806, Sec. 11, eff. September 1, 2005.

Sec. 36.104. STATE DECISION; CONTINUATION OF ACTION.

(a) Not later than the last day of the period prescribed by Section 36.102(c) or an extension of that period as provided by Section 36.102(d), the state shall:
(1) proceed with the action; or
(2) notify the court that the state declines to take over the action.
(b) If the state declines to take over the action, the person bringing the action may proceed without the state's participation. On request by the state, the state is entitled to be served with copies of all pleadings filed in the action and be provided at the state's expense with copies of all deposition transcripts. If the person bringing the action proceeds without the state's participation, the court, without limiting the status and right of that person, may permit the state to intervene at a later date on a showing of good cause.
Added by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 1153, Sec. 4.08, eff. Sept. 1, 1997.
Amended by:
Acts 2005, 79th Leg., Ch. 806, Sec. 12, eff. September 1, 2005.
Acts 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., Ch. 29, Sec. 3, eff. May 4, 2007.
Acts 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., Ch. 29, Sec. 4, eff. May 4, 2007.

Sec. 36.105. REPRESENTATION OF STATE BY PRIVATE ATTORNEY.

The attorney general may contract with a private attorney to represent the state in an action under this subchapter with which the state elects to proceed.
Added by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 1153, Sec. 4.08, eff. Sept. 1, 1997.

Sec. 36.106. INTERVENTION BY OTHER PARTIES PROHIBITED.

A person other than the state may not intervene or bring a related action based on the facts underlying a pending action brought under this subchapter.
Added by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 1153, Sec. 4.08, eff. Sept. 1, 1997.

Sec. 36.107. RIGHTS OF PARTIES IF STATE CONTINUES ACTION.

(a) If the state proceeds with the action, the state has the primary responsibility for prosecuting the action and is not bound by an act of the person bringing the action. The person bringing the action has the right to continue as a party to the action, subject to the limitations set forth by this section.
(b) The state may dismiss the action notwithstanding the objections of the person bringing the action if:
(1) the attorney general notifies the person that the state has filed a motion to dismiss; and
(2) the court provides the person with an opportunity for a hearing on the motion.
(c) The state may settle the action with the defendant notwithstanding the objections of the person bringing the action if the court determines, after a hearing, that the proposed settlement is fair, adequate, and reasonable under all the circumstances. On a showing of good cause, the hearing may be held in camera.
(d) On a showing by the state that unrestricted participation during the course of the litigation by the person bringing the action would interfere with or unduly delay the state's prosecution of the case, or would be repetitious, irrelevant, or for purposes of harassment, the court may impose limitations on the person's participation, including:
(1) limiting the number of witnesses the person may call;
(2) limiting the length of the testimony of witnesses called by the person;
(3) limiting the person's cross-examination of witnesses; or
(4) otherwise limiting the participation by the person in the litigation.
(e) On a showing by the defendant that unrestricted participation during the course of the litigation by the person bringing the action would be for purposes of harassment or would cause the defendant undue burden or unnecessary expense, the court may limit the participation by the person in the litigation.
Added by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 1153, Sec. 4.08, eff. Sept. 1, 1997.

Sec. 36.108. STAY OF CERTAIN DISCOVERY.

(a) On a showing by the state that certain actions of discovery by the person bringing the action would interfere with the state's investigation or prosecution of a criminal or civil matter arising out of the same facts, the court may stay the discovery for a period not to exceed 60 days.
(b) The court shall hear a motion to stay discovery under this section in camera.
(c) The court may extend the period prescribed by Subsection (a) on a further showing in camera that the state has pursued the criminal or civil investigation or proceedings with reasonable diligence and that any proposed discovery in the civil action will interfere with the ongoing criminal or civil investigation or proceedings.
Added by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 1153, Sec. 4.08, eff. Sept. 1, 1997.

Sec. 36.109. PURSUIT OF ALTERNATE REMEDY BY STATE.

(a) Notwithstanding Section 36.101, the state may elect to pursue the state's claim through any alternate remedy available to the state, including any administrative proceeding to determine an administrative penalty. If an alternate remedy is pursued in another proceeding, the person bringing the action has the same rights in the other proceeding as the person would have had if the action had continued under this subchapter.
(b) A finding of fact or conclusion of law made in the other proceeding that has become final is conclusive on all parties to an action under this subchapter. For purposes of this subsection, a finding or conclusion is final if:
(1) the finding or conclusion has been finally determined on appeal to the appropriate court;
(2) no appeal has been filed with respect to the finding or conclusion and all time for filing an appeal has expired; or
(3) the finding or conclusion is not subject to judicial review.
Added by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 1153, Sec. 4.08, eff. Sept. 1, 1997.

Sec. 36.110. AWARD TO PRIVATE PLAINTIFF.

(a) If the state proceeds with an action under this subchapter, the person bringing the action is entitled, except as provided by Subsection (b), to receive at least 15 percent but not more than 25 percent of the proceeds of the action, depending on the extent to which the person substantially contributed to the prosecution of the action.
(a-1) If the state does not proceed with an action under this subchapter, the person bringing the action is entitled, except as provided by Subsection (b), to receive at least 25 percent but not more than 30 percent of the proceeds of the action. The entitlement of a person under this subsection is not affected by any subsequent intervention in the action by the state in accordance with Section 36.104(b).
(b) If the court finds that the action is based primarily on disclosures of specific information, other than information provided by the person bringing the action, relating to allegations or transactions in a criminal or civil hearing, in a legislative or administrative report, hearing, audit, or investigation, or from the news media, the court may award the amount the court considers appropriate but not more than seven percent of the proceeds of the action. The court shall consider the significance of the information and the role of the person bringing the action in advancing the case to litigation.
(c) A payment to a person under this section shall be made from the proceeds of the action. A person receiving a payment under this section is also entitled to receive from the defendant an amount for reasonable expenses, reasonable attorney's fees, and costs that the court finds to have been necessarily incurred. The court's determination of expenses, fees, and costs to be awarded under this subsection shall be made only after the defendant has been found liable in the action.
(d) In this section, "proceeds of the action" includes proceeds of a settlement of the action.
Added by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 1153, Sec. 4.08, eff. Sept. 1, 1997.
Amended by:
Acts 2005, 79th Leg., Ch. 806, Sec. 13, eff. September 1, 2005.
Acts 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., Ch. 29, Sec. 5, eff. May 4, 2007.

Sec. 36.111. REDUCTION OF AWARD.

(a) If the court finds that the action was brought by a person who planned and initiated the violation of Section 36.002 on which the action was brought, the court may, to the extent the court considers appropriate, reduce the share of the proceeds of the action the person would otherwise receive under Section 36.110, taking into account the person's role in advancing the case to litigation and any relevant circumstances pertaining to the violation.
(b) If the person bringing the action is convicted of criminal conduct arising from the person's role in the violation of Section 36.002, the court shall dismiss the person from the civil action and the person may not receive any share of the proceeds of the action. A dismissal under this subsection does not prejudice the right of the state to continue the action.
Added by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 1153, Sec. 4.08, eff. Sept. 1, 1997.

Sec. 36.112. AWARD TO DEFENDANT FOR FRIVOLOUS ACTION.

Chapter 105, Civil Practice and Remedies Code, applies in an action under this subchapter with which the state proceeds.
Added by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 1153, Sec. 4.08, eff. Sept. 1, 1997.

Sec. 36.113. CERTAIN ACTIONS BARRED.

(a) A person may not bring an action under this subchapter that is based on allegations or transactions that are the subject of a civil suit or an administrative penalty proceeding in which the state is already a party.
(b) A person may not bring an action under this subchapter that is based on the public disclosure of allegations or transactions in a criminal or civil hearing, in a legislative or administrative report, hearing, audit, or investigation, or from the news media, unless the person bringing the action is an original source of the information. In this subsection, "original source" means an individual who has direct and independent knowledge of the information on which the allegations are based and has voluntarily provided the information to the state before filing an action under this subchapter that is based on the information.
Added by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 1153, Sec. 4.08, eff. Sept. 1, 1997.

Sec. 36.114. STATE NOT LIABLE FOR CERTAIN EXPENSES.

The state is not liable for expenses that a person incurs in bringing an action under this subchapter.
Added by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 1153, Sec. 4.08, eff. Sept. 1, 1997.

Sec. 36.115. RETALIATION BY EMPLOYER AGAINST PERSON BRINGING SUIT PROHIBITED.

(a) A person who is discharged, demoted, suspended, threatened, harassed, or in any other manner discriminated against in the terms of employment by the person's employer because of a lawful act taken by the person in furtherance of an action under this subchapter, including investigation for, initiation of, testimony for, or assistance in an action filed or to be filed under this subchapter, is entitled to:
(1) reinstatement with the same seniority status the person would have had but for the discrimination; and
(2) not less than two times the amount of back pay, interest on the back pay, and compensation for any special damages sustained as a result of the discrimination, including litigation costs and reasonable attorney's fees.
(b) A person may bring an action in the appropriate district court for the relief provided in this section.
Added by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 1153, Sec. 4.08, eff. Sept. 1, 1997.

Sec. 36.116. SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY NOT WAIVED.

Except as provided by Section 36.112, this subchapter does not waive sovereign immunity.
Added by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 1153, Sec. 4.08, eff. Sept. 1, 1997.

Sec. 36.117. ATTORNEY GENERAL COMPENSATION.

The office of the attorney general may retain a reasonable portion of recoveries under this subchapter, not to exceed amounts specified in the General Appropriations Act, for the administration of this subchapter.
Added by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 1153, Sec. 4.08, eff. Sept. 1, 1997.

SUBCHAPTER D. REVOCATION OF CERTAIN OCCUPATIONAL LICENSES

Sec. 36.132. REVOCATION OF LICENSES.

(a) In this section:
(1) "License" means a license, certificate, registration, permit, or other authorization that:
(A) is issued by a licensing authority;
(B) is subject before expiration to suspension, revocation, forfeiture, or termination by an issuing licensing authority; and
(C) must be obtained before a person may practice or engage in a particular business, occupation, or profession.
(2) "Licensing authority" means:
(A) the Texas Medical Board;
(B) the State Board of Dental Examiners;
(C) the Texas State Board of Examiners of Psychologists;
(D) the Texas State Board of Social Worker Examiners;
(E) the Texas Board of Nursing;
(F) the Texas Board of Physical Therapy Examiners;
(G) the Texas Board of Occupational Therapy Examiners; or
(H) another state agency authorized to regulate a provider who receives or is eligible to receive payment for a health care service under the Medicaid program.
(b) A licensing authority shall revoke a license issued by the authority to a person if the person is convicted of a felony under Section 35A.02, Penal Code. In revoking the license, the licensing authority shall comply with all procedures generally applicable to the licensing authority in revoking licenses.
Added by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 1153, Sec. 4.09, eff. Sept. 1, 1997. Amended by Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 553, Sec. 2.012, eff. Feb. 1, 2004.
Amended by:
Acts 2005, 79th Leg., Ch. 806, Sec. 15, eff. September 1, 2005.
Acts 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., Ch. 889, Sec. 70, eff. September 1, 2007.

Texas False Claims Act
Texas Human Resources Code
Chapter 32. Medical Assistance Program
Subchapters B. Administrative Provisions
§32.039. Damages and Penalties

(a) In this section:

(1) "Claim" means an application for payment of health care services under Title XIX of the federal Social Security Act that is submitted by a person who is under a contract or provider agreement with the department.

(1-a) "Inducement" includes a service, cash in any amount, entertainment, or any item of value.

(2) "Managed care organization" means any entity or person that is authorized or otherwise permitted by law to arrange for or provide a managed care plan.

(3) "Managed care plan" means a plan under which a person undertakes to provide, arrange for, pay for, or reimburse any part of the cost of any health care service. A part of the plan must consist of arranging for or providing health care services as distinguished from indemnification against the cost of those services on a prepaid basis through insurance or otherwise. The term does not include a plan that indemnifies a person for the cost of health care services through insurance.

(4) A person "should know" or "should have known" information to be false if the person acts in deliberate ignorance of the truth or falsity of the information or in reckless disregard of the truth or falsity of the information, and proof of the person's specific intent to defraud is not required.

(b) A person commits a violation if the person:

(1) presents or causes to be presented to the department a claim that contains a statement or representation the person knows or should know to be false;

(1-a) engages in conduct that violates Section 102.001, Occupations Code;

(1-b) solicits or receives, directly or indirectly, overtly or covertly any remuneration, including any kickback, bribe, or rebate, in cash or in kind for referring an individual to a person for the furnishing of, or for arranging the furnishing of, any item or service for which payment may be made, in whole or in part, under the medical assistance program, provided that this subdivision does not prohibit the referral of a patient to another practitioner within a multispecialty group or university medical services research and development plan (practice plan) for medically necessary services;

(1-c) solicits or receives, directly or indirectly, overtly or covertly any remuneration, including any kickback, bribe, or rebate, in cash or in kind for purchasing, leasing, or ordering, or arranging for or recommending the purchasing, leasing, or ordering of, any good, facility, service, or item for which payment may be made, in whole or in part, under the medical assistance program;

(1-d) offers or pays, directly or indirectly, overtly or covertly any remuneration, including any kickback, bribe, or rebate, in cash or in kind to induce a person to refer an individual to another person for the furnishing of, or for arranging the furnishing of, any item or service for which payment may be made, in whole or in part, under the medical assistance program, provided that this subdivision does not prohibit the referral of a patient to another practitioner within a multispecialty group or university medical services research and development plan (practice plan) for medically necessary services;

(1-e) offers or pays, directly or indirectly, overtly or covertly any remuneration, including any kickback, bribe, or rebate, in cash or in kind to induce a person to purchase, lease, or order, or arrange for or recommend the purchase, lease, or order of, any good, facility, service, or item for which payment may be made, in whole or in part, under the medical assistance program;

(1-f) provides, offers, or receives an inducement in a manner or for a purpose not otherwise prohibited by this section or Section 102.001, Occupations Code, to or from a person, including a recipient, provider, employee or agent of a provider, third-party vendor, or public servant, for the purpose of influencing or being influenced in a decision regarding:

(A) selection of a provider or receipt of a good or service under the medical assistance program;

(B) the use of goods or services provided under the medical assistance program; or

(2) is a managed care organization that contracts with the department to provide or arrange to provide health care benefits or services to individuals eligible for medical assistance and:

(A) fails to provide to an individual a health care benefit or service that the organization is required to provide under the contract with the department;

(B) fails to provide to the department information required to be provided by law, department rule, or contractual provision;

(C) engages in a fraudulent activity in connection with the enrollment in the organization's managed care plan of an individual eligible for medical assistance or in connection with marketing the organization's services to an individual eligible for medical assistance; or

(D) engages in actions that indicate a pattern of:

(i) wrongful denial of payment for a health care benefit or service that the organization is required to provide under the contract with the department; or

(ii) wrongful delay of at least 45 days or a longer period specified in the contract with the department, not to exceed 60 days, in making payment for a health care benefit or service that the organization is required to provide under the contract with the department.

(1) the amount paid, if any, as a result of the violation and interest on that amount determined at the rate provided by law for legal judgments and accruing from the date on which the payment was made; and

(2) payment of an administrative penalty of an amount not to exceed twice the amount paid, if any, as a result of the violation, plus an amount:

(A) not less than $5,000 or more than $15,000 for each violation that results in injury to an elderly person, as defined by Section 48.002(1), a disabled person, as defined by Section 48.002(8)(A), or a person younger than 18 years of age; or

(B) not more than $10,000 for each violation that does not result in injury to a person described by Paragraph (A).

(d) Unless the provider submitted information to the department for use in preparing a voucher that the provider knew or should have known was false or failed to correct information that the provider knew or should have known was false when provided an opportunity to do so, this section does not apply to a claim based on the voucher if the department calculated and printed the amount of the claim on the voucher and then submitted the voucher to the provider for the provider's signature. In addition, the provider's signature on the voucher does not constitute fraud. The department shall adopt rules that establish a grace period during which errors contained in a voucher prepared by the department may be corrected without penalty to the provider.

(e) In determining the amount of the penalty to be assessed under Subsection (c)(2), the department shall consider:

(1) the seriousness of the violation;

(2) whether the person had previously committed a violation; and

(3) the amount necessary to deter the person from committing future violations.

(f) If after an examination of the facts the department concludes that the person committed a violation, the department may issue a preliminary report stating the facts on which it based its conclusion, recommending that an administrative penalty under this section be imposed and recommending the amount of the proposed penalty.

(g) The department shall give written notice of the report to the person charged with committing the violation. The notice must include a brief summary of the facts, a statement of the amount of the recommended penalty, and a statement of the person's right to an informal review of the alleged violation, the amount of the penalty, or both the alleged violation and the amount of the penalty.

(h) Not later than the 10th day after the date on which the person charged with committing the violation receives the notice, the person may either give the department written consent to the report, including the recommended penalty, or make a written request for an informal review by the department.

(i) If the person charged with committing the violation consents to the penalty recommended by the department or fails to timely request an informal review, the department shall assess the penalty. The department shall give the person written notice of its action. The person shall pay the penalty not later than the 30th day after the date on which the person receives the notice.

(j) If the person charged with committing the violation requests an informal review as provided by Subsection (h), the department shall conduct the review. The department shall give the person written notice of the results of the review.

(k) Not later than the 10th day after the date on which the person charged with committing the violation receives the notice prescribed by Subsection (j), the person may make to the department a written request for a hearing. The hearing must be conducted in accordance with Chapter 2001, Government Code.

(l) If, after informal review, a person who has been ordered to pay a penalty fails to request a formal hearing in a timely manner, the department shall assess the penalty. The department shall give the person written notice of its action. The person shall pay the penalty not later than the 30th day after the date on which the person receives the notice.

(m) Within 30 days after the date on which the board's order issued after a hearing under Subsection (k) becomes final as provided by Section 2001.144, Government Code, the person shall:

(1) pay the amount of the penalty;

(2) pay the amount of the penalty and file a petition for judicial review contesting the occurrence of the violation, the amount of the penalty, or both the occurrence of the violation and the amount of the penalty; or

(3) without paying the amount of the penalty, file a petition for judicial review contesting the occurrence of the violation, the amount of the penalty, or both the occurrence of the violation and the amount of the penalty.

(n) A person who acts under Subsection (m)(3) within the 30-day period may:

(1) stay enforcement of the penalty by:

(A) paying the amount of the penalty to the court for placement in an escrow account; or

(B) giving to the court a supersedeas bond that is approved by the court for the amount of the penalty and that is effective until all judicial review of the department's order is final; or

(2) request the court to stay enforcement of the penalty by:

(A) filing with the court a sworn affidavit of the person stating that the person is financially unable to pay the amount of the penalty and is financially unable to give the supersedeas bond; and

(B) giving a copy of the affidavit to the commissioner by certified mail.

(o) If the commissioner receives a copy of an affidavit under Subsection (n)(2), the commissioner may file with the court, within five days after the date the copy is received, a contest to the affidavit. The court shall hold a hearing on the facts alleged in the affidavit as soon as practicable and shall stay the enforcement of the penalty on finding that the alleged facts are true. The person who files an affidavit has the burden of proving that the person is financially unable to pay the amount of the penalty and to give a supersedeas bond.

(p) If the person charged does not pay the amount of the penalty and the enforcement of the penalty is not stayed, the department may forward the matter to the attorney general for enforcement of the penalty and interest as provided by law for legal judgments. An action to enforce a penalty order under this section must be initiated in a court of competent jurisdiction in Travis County or in the county in which the violation was committed.

(q) Judicial review of a department order or review under this section assessing a penalty is under the substantial evidence rule. A suit may be initiated by filing a petition with a district court in Travis County, as provided by Subchapter G, Chapter 2001, Government Code.

(r) If a penalty is reduced or not assessed, the department shall remit to the person the appropriate amount plus accrued interest if the penalty has been paid or shall execute a release of the bond if a supersedeas bond has been posted. The accrued interest on amounts remitted by the department under this subsection shall be paid at a rate equal to the rate provided by law for legal judgments and shall be paid for the period beginning on the date the penalty is paid to the department under this section and ending on the date the penalty is remitted.

(s) A damage, cost, or penalty collected under this section is not an allowable expense in a claim or cost report that is or could be used to determine a rate or payment under the medical assistance program.

(t) All funds collected under this section shall be deposited in the State Treasury to the credit of the General Revenue Fund.

(u) Except as provided by Subsection (w), a person found liable for a violation under Subsection (c) that resulted in injury to an elderly person, as defined by Section 48.002(a)(1), a disabled person, as defined by Section 48.002(a)(8)(A), or a person younger than 18 years of age may not provide or arrange to provide health care services under the medical assistance program for a period of 10 years. The department by rule may provide for a period of ineligibility longer than 10 years. The period of ineligibility begins on the date on which the determination that the person is liable becomes final.

(v) Except as provided by Subsection (w), a person found liable for a violation under Subsection (c) that did not result in injury to an elderly person, as defined by Section 48.002(a)(1), a disabled person, as defined by Section 48.002(a)(8)(A), or a person younger than 18 years of age may not provide or arrange to provide health care services under the medical assistance program for a period of three years. The department by rule may provide for a period of ineligibility longer than three years. The period of ineligibility begins on the date on which the determination that the person is liable becomes final.

(w) The department by rule may prescribe criteria under which a person described by Subsection (u) or (v) is not prohibited from providing or arranging to provide health care services under the medical assistance program. The criteria may include consideration of:

(1) the person's knowledge of the violation;

(2) the likelihood that education provided to the person would be sufficient to prevent future violations;

(3) the potential impact on availability of services in the community served by the person; and

(4) any other reasonable factor identified by the department.

(x) Subsections (b)(1-b) through (1-f) do not prohibit a person from engaging in:

(1) generally accepted business practices, as determined by department rule, including:

(A) conducting a marketing campaign;

(B) providing token items of minimal value that advertise the person's trade name; and

(2) the provision of a value-added service if the person is a managed care organization; or

(3) other conduct specifically authorized by law, including conduct authorized by federal safe harbor regulations (42 C.F.R. Section 1001.952).

Added by Acts 1987, 70th Leg., ch. 1052, Sec. 2.04, eff. Sept. 1, 1987. Amended by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, Sec. 5.95(49), (53), eff. Sept. 1, 1995; Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 1153, Sec. 3.01(a), eff. Sept. 1, 1997; Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 12, Sec. 1, 2, eff. Sept. 1, 1999; Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 257, Sec. 4, 5, eff. Sept. 1, 2003.

Amended by:

Acts 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., Ch. 127, Sec. 2, eff. September 1, 2007.

Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) Fraud Lawsuits, Dentist CHIP Fraud Lawsuits, Dentist Medicaid Fraud Lawsuits, and Dentist Office CHIP FRAUD Qui Tam Whistleblower Lawsuits

As the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) formerly known as the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) continues to expand and provide more dental and health services to children, dental CHIP fraud and medical CHIP fraud are becoming more common. Some medical doctors, dentists, health care companies, medical clinics, hospitals, home health care companies, dental clinics, and other dental and health care providers have found that it is more profitable to commit fraud regarding treatments they provide than it is to practice medicine or dentistry.

The Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) is a program administered by the United States Department of Health and Human Services that provides matching funds to states for health insurance to families with children. The program was designed with the intent to cover uninsured children in families with incomes that are modest but too high to qualify for Medicaid. This program includes both medical coverage and dental coverage.

At its creation in 1997, State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) was the largest expansion of taxpayer-funded health insurance coverage for children in the U.S. since Medicaid began in the 1960s. The statutory authority for State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) is under title XXI of the Social Security Act. States were given flexibility in designing their State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) eligibility requirements and policies within broad federal guidelines. Some states have received authority through waivers of statutory provisions to use State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) funds to cover the parents of children receiving benefits from both SCHIP and Medicaid, pregnant women, and other adults. SCHIP covered 6.6 million children and 670,000 adults at some point during Federal fiscal year 2006, and every state has an approved plan.

The budget for the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) has continued to rise creating an environment for large dental clinics, large medical clinics, corporate "for profit" medicine, and corporate "for profit" dentistry to create mass service dental and medical clinics with large billing departments and complicated billing where CHIP fraud, Medicaid fraud, and Medicare fraud can flourish and create large profits.

Texas CHIP Fraud Whistleblower Recovery Lawsuits, Texas Medicaid Billing Fraud Whistleblower Lawsuits, Texas CHIP Fraud Whistleblower Compensation Lawsuits, and Texas Medicaid Kickback Whistleblower Recovery Lawsuits (Whistleblowers that are the first to file with Specialized Knowledge)

Texas Dentist Whistleblowers, Texas Dentist Office Manager Whistleblowers, Texas Pediatrician Whistleblowers, Texas Nursing Home Whistleblowers, Texas CFO Whistleblowers, Texas Benefit Coordinator Whistleblowers, Texas Book Keeper Whistleblowers, Texas Hospital Administrator Whistleblowers, Texas Home Health Care Coordinators Whistleblowers, and Texas Health Care Provider Whistleblowers are stepping up and exposing CHIP fraud and Medicaid Billing Fraud that is costing taxpayers millions of dollars. The economic incentive for these Whistleblowers is that if they are an original source with special knowledge of fraud and are the first to file, they receive a portion of the money that the government recovers.

There are several keys to a successful Texas False Claims Act Qui Tam Whistleblower action including 1) obtaining original and specialized information of the fraud, 2) being the first to file regarding the specific fraud, and 3) protecting the whistleblower for retaliation.

Being the First to File on the Fraud is Essential for Recovery Under the False Claims Act and can Prevent Potential Criminal Liability in Dentist Medicare Billing Fraud, Dentist Medicaid Billing Fraud, Dental CHIP Fraud, and other Medicare Fraud, Medicare Fraud, & CHIP Fraud Lawsuits

It is also essential to not delay in coming forward with a False Claim Act Qui Tam Action as the first whistleblower to file is eligible to be a relator and make a large recovery for exposing the fraud. Additionally, when the fraudulent scheme is exposed, the people that kept the fraud secret can sometimes be found liable for criminal activity for not exposing the fraud that was being committed and further be held liable for continuing criminal activity.

FEDERAL GRAND JURY CHARGES BROWNWOOD, TEXAS, DENTIST IN HEALTH CARE FRAUD CASE

LUBBOCK, Texas — James Crow, 65, of Brownwood, Texas, has been indicted by a federal grand jury in Lubbock on numerous felony offenses involving health care fraud, announced U.S. Attorney James T. Jacks of the Northern District of Texas. Crow, who practices general dentistry in Brownwood, is charged with six counts of false statements involving a health care matter and 18 counts of health care fraud. It is expected that Crow will make his initial appearance in federal court in Lubbock later this month.

The indictment alleges that from January 2004 through December 2007, Crow, a dentist enrolled with Medicaid, filed, and caused to be filed, Medicaid claims for payment of services that he did not render and for payment of services that were billed with improper billing codes. The indictment alleges Crow billed Medicaid for numerous resin-based composites restorations (cavity fillings), when in fact, either no such fillings were performed, or he instead performed other dental services reimbursed at lower rates.

An indictment is an accusation by a federal grand jury, and a defendant is entitled to the presumption of innocence unless proven guilty. However, if convicted, each false statement count carries a maximum statutory sentence of five years in prison and a $250,000 fine. Each of the health care fraud counts carries a maximum statutory sentence of 10 years in prison and a $250,000 fine. In addition, the indictment includes a forfeiture allegation which will require Crow, if convicted, to forfeit a money judgment of the gross proceeds, obtained directly or indirectly, as a result of the offense, of at least $1 million,

The case is being investigated by the Texas Medicaid Fraud Control Unit and the FBI. Assistant U.S. Attorneys Amy Burch and Denise Williams of the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Lubbock are in charge of the prosecution.

Medicaid Billing Fraud Lawsuits, Medicare Billing Fraud Lawsuits, and the Increase in Medicare and Medicaid Spending

Medicaid is a public health care problem in the United States that provides health care, dental care, and orthodontic care for eligible individuals and families with low incomes and resources. The Medicaid Program is jointly funded by state and federal governments, but is managed by the states. Medicaid is the largest source of funding for medical and health-related services for people with limited income in the United States and the Medicaid program has been increasing. The fastest growing aspect of Medicaid is nursing home coverage and this is expected to continue as the Baby Boomer generation begins to reach nursing home age.

Unlike Medicare, which is solely a federal program, Medicaid is a joint federal-state program. Each state operates its own Medicaid system. Each state's Medicaid Program must conform to federal guidelines in order for the state to receive matching funds and grants. For many states Medicaid has become a major budget issue as on average the state's matching costs of the Medicaid program is about 16.8% of state general funds. According to CMS, the Medicaid program provided health care services to more than 46.0 million people in 2001. In 2008, Medicaid provided health coverage and services to approximately 49 million low-income children, pregnant women, elderly persons, and disabled individuals. Federal Medicaid outlays were estimated to be $204 billion in 2008. Medicaid payments currently assist nearly 60 percent of all nursing home residents and about 37 percent of all childbirths in the United States. The Federal Government pays on average 57 percent of Medicaid expenses.

Texas False Claims Act Lawyers, Texas Medicaid Fraud Whistleblower Recovery Lawyers, Texas Medicaid False Billing Whistleblower Award Lawyers, Texas Medicaid Double Billing Fraud Lawyers, Texas Medicaid Fraud False Billing Lawyers, Texas Unnecessary Medical Treatment Relator Lawyers, and Texas Medicaid Fraud Whistleblower Lawyers

Through Federal False Claims Act Whistleblower Lawsuits, Qui Tam Lawsuits, and other Government Fraud Lawsuits, hundreds of billions of dollars have been recovered from fraudulent government contractors that have stolen large amounts of money from the government and taxpayers. Included in the heroes that have helped recover large amounts of money for taxpayers are Whistleblowers that have recovered billions for themselves and a growing number of dentist Medicaid fraud whistleblowers.

It is extremely important that Whistleblowers continue to expose fraudulent billing practices and unnecessary treatments that cost billions of dollars. If you are aware of a large government contractor that is defrauding the United States Government out of millions or billions of dollars, contact Texas Federal False Claims Act Whistleblower Lawyer Jason Coomer. As a Federal False Claims Act Whistle Blower Lawyer, he works with other powerful qui tam lawyers that handle large Government Fraud cases. He works with San Antonio Qui Tam Lawyers, Houston Medicare Fraud Whistleblower Lawyers, California Healthcare Fraud Lawyers, Dallas Defense Contractor Fraud Lawyers, and other Medicare Fraud Whistleblower Lawyers as well as with Qui Tam Federal False Claim Act Whistleblower Lawyers throughout the United States and the World to blow the whistle on fraud that hurts the United States and taxpayers.

Texas False Claims Act Lawyer, Texas Medicaid Fraud Whistleblower Recovery Lawyer, Texas Medicaid False Billing Whistleblower Award Lawyer, Texas Medicaid Double Billing Fraud Lawyer, Texas Medicaid Fraud False Billing Lawyer, Texas Unnecessary Medical Treatment Relator Lawyer, and Texas Medicaid Fraud Whistleblower Lawyer

Texas False Claims Act Lawyer, Texas Medicaid Fraud Whistleblower Recovery Lawyer, Texas Medicaid False Billing Whistleblower Award Lawyer, Texas Medicaid Double Billing Fraud Lawyer, Texas Medicaid Fraud False Billing Lawyer, Texas Unnecessary Medical Treatment Relator Lawyer, and Texas Medicaid Fraud Whistleblower Lawyer

If you are aware of Texas Medicaid kickbacks, Texas fraudulent Medicaid billing, or other Texas Medicaid fraud and are the original source with special knowledge and evidence of the fraud and want to be a whistleblower, please feel free to contact Texas False Claims Act Lawyer and Texas Medicaid Fraud Whistleblower Recovery Lawyer Jason Coomer via e-mail message or use our submission form.

Feel Free to Contact Us with any Questions

Associations

Admitted to Practice in the United States District Court Western District of Texas