Government contractor wage
fraud has increased as some government contractors and
subcontractors have sought to fraudulently avoid paying
the prevailing wage or fringe benefits in violation of
the Davis Bacon and Related Act (DBRA). Government
Contractors that violate DBRA and/or falsely certify
services or goods that they seek payment from the
government for can be subject to Federal False Claims
Act Lawsuits and required to pay back fraudulently taken
money. Whistleblowers that have independent
knowledge of fraud committed against the government by
government contractors and subcontractors can become American
heroes by blowing the whistle on fraud and if they are
the first to provide notice of the fraud can recover a
portion of the recovered money.
If you are aware of a defense
contractor, highway contractor, large health care
company, or other large contractor or subcontractor that
is defrauding the United States Government out of
millions or billions of dollars, contact
Texas
Government Contractor Fraud lawyer, Jason Coomer, via e-mail
or online submission
form for a free review of a government
contractor fraud qui tam claim.
Government Spending and Government Fraud Lawsuits
In 2008, government spending in the United
States moved past $5 Trillion. The increased
government spending over the past decade created an
environment where many corporations, dishonest
government contractors, fraudulent government
sub-contractors,
and other dishonest people to find to defraud the
government out of large amounts of money.
Whistleblowers that are aware of fraudulent billing of
the government can often work with lawyers and the
Department of Justice in exposing criminals, seeking
back tax payer money, and preventing future fraud.
The Davis Bacon and Related Acts (DBRA), Federal False
Claims Act Lawsuits, and Government Contractor Fraud Lawsuits
The Davis Bacon and Related Acts (DBRA)
requires all contractors and subcontractors performing
work on federal or District of Columbia construction
contracts or federally assisted contracts in excess of
$2,000 to pay their laborers and mechanics not less than
the prevailing wage rates and fringe benefits for
corresponding classes of laborers and mechanics employed
on similar projects in the area. The prevailing wage
rates and fringe benefits are determined by the
Secretary of Labor for inclusion in covered contracts.
In addition to the Davis Bacon Act
itself, Congress added Davis-Bacon prevailing wage
provisions to approximately 60 laws—"related Acts"—under
which federal agencies assist construction projects
through grants, loans, loan guarantees, and insurance.
(Examples of the related Acts are the Federal-Aid
Highway Acts, the Housing and Community Development Act
of 1974, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act.)
Generally, the application of prevailing wage
requirements to projects receiving federal assistance
under any particular "related" Act depends on the
provisions of that law.
The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL)
has oversight responsibilities to assure coordination of
administration and consistency of enforcement of the
labor standards provisions of the Davis Bacon and
Related Acts. Under this authority, DOL has issued
regulations establishing standards and procedures for
the administration and enforcement of the Davis-Bacon
labor standards provisions. Federal contracting agencies
have day-to-day responsibility for administration and
enforcement of the Davis-Bacon labor standards
provisions in covered contracts for which they are
responsible or to which they provide federal assistance
under laws they administer.
For more information on the
Davis-Bacon and Related Acts (DBRA), please go to the
following
United
States Department of Labor Web Page.
Through government contractor fraud qui tam lawsuits
and other federal false claims act lawsuits,
whistleblowers, the United States Department of Justice,
and fraudulent contractor qui lawyers have helped the
government recover billions of dollars that
was wrongfully taken through fraud from the government. Often
in these cases the fraudulent government contractor has
paid off key government official to look the other way
and it is essential to have a whistleblower with
specialized knowledge of the fraud to expose the
contractor fraud.
In other cases, the fraudulent government contractor is
exploiting a lack of efficient supervision in the
bureaucratic system. In these cases, it also typically
takes a whistleblower with specialized knowledge to locate the
fraud and expose it.
History of Whistleblower Lawsuits, Government Contractor Corruption, and
Qui Tam Lawsuits
During
the Civil War, corrupt military contractors were
defrauding the United States Army out of hundreds of
thousands of dollars and putting troops at risk by
supplying troops with defective products and faulty war
equipment. Illegal price gouging was a common practice
and the armed forces of the United States suffered.
In response, Abraham Lincoln enacted the Federal Civil
False Claims Act. A key provision of the act was known
as qui tam.
In times of war corrupt government
contractors including corrupt defense contractors
sometimes begin to price gouge, provide troops with
defective products, misstate what good are provided, and
fraudulently take money from the government. This
is especially true when no bid contracts allow defense
contractors to make huge profits without adequate checks
on the goods or services provided.
Government Fraud Lawsuits, Qui Tam Lawsuits, and Qui Tam Lawyers
The "Qui Tam" abbreviation is from Latin and
refers to "a person who files a suit for the king as for
himself". Qui tam claims have existed for centuries
as deceptive government contractors have been around as
long as government has contracted with private companies
to provide services. Qui tam actions
allow a private citizen or whistleblower to file a lawsuit on behalf of
the U.S. government in an effort to recover losses
caused by fraud against the government. The law is an
incentive for civilians who know of individuals or
companies making false claims for profit to come forward
with information. In reward, the "whistleblower" (also
known as the relator) shares in any federal revenue
recovered. In these situations, it is essential
that the fraud exposed is not known, but is exposed by
the relator.
Government Fraud Lawyers work with
whistleblowers to expose deceptive and corrupt
government contractors. As a Texas Government
Fraud Lawyer,
Jason Coomer, works with other Texas Qui Tam Lawyers
throughout the state of Texas as well as through the
United States. He is able to work with Houston
Government Fraud Lawyers, Dallas Qui Tam Lawyers, San Antonio
Government Fraud
Lawyers, Washington Contractor Fraud Lawyers, New York Qui Tam
Lawyers, Virginia Government Contractor Fraud Lawyers, and other Qui Tam Lawyers to help American
heroes that blow the whistle on corrupt government
contractors.
Economic Incentives for Whistleblowers
Lawsuits, Government Fraud Lawsuits, and Qui Tam
Lawsuits
The basic premise of "qui tam
actions" is to encourage private citizens to step up
and blow the whistle on fraud. To be able to
qualify as a relator and collect a portion of the
recovery the whistleblower must have specialized
knowledge of the fraud and be the first to provide
notice of the fraud. This first to file rule
encourages whistleblowers to report fraud sooner
rather than later.
Qui tam provisions of the False
Claims Act are based on the theory that one of the
least expensive and most effective means of
preventing frauds on taxpayers and the government is
to make the perpetrators of government fraud liable
to actions by private persons acting under the
strong stimulus of personal ill will or the hope of
gain.
The strong public policy behind
creating an economic gain for whistleblowers is
that the government would be significantly less
likely to learn of the allegations of fraud, but for
persons in certain positions with specialized
knowledge of fraud that has been committed. Congress
has made it clear that creating this economic
incentive is beneficial not only for the government,
taxpayers, and the realtor, but is an efficient
method of regulating government to prevent fraud and
fraudulent schemes.
The central purpose of the qui
tam provisions of the False Claims Act is to set up
incentives to supplement government regulation and
enforcement by encouraging whistleblowers with
specialized knowledge of fraud going on in the
government to blow the whistle on the crime.
The whistleblower's share of
recovery is a maximum of 30 percent and the
government's prior knowledge of fraud now does not
necessarily bar a whistleblower from collecting lost
revenue. If the government takes over the
lawsuit, the relator can "continue as a party to the
action." The defendant is also required to pay for
the relator's attorney fees. The whistleblower is
also protected from retaliatory actions by his or
her employer. As a result of the 1986 amendment and
subsequent amendments to the False Claims Act, qui
tam lawsuits have increased dramatically. Though
the law was first enacted for corrupt defense
contractors during the civil war, the subsequent
amendments has uncovered fraudulent government
contractors building roads, bridges, and other
public works as well as health care providers and
others committing Medicare fraud. So far,
billions of dollars have been recovered.
Anyone who defrauds the government
out of revenue can be held accountable under the False
Claims Act. Common defendants include defense
contractors, health care providers, other government
contractors & subcontractors, state and local government
agencies, and private universities. Whistleblowers
often include current and former employees of the
defrauding company, competitors of government
contractors and public interest groups.
The False Claims Act was enacted to
encourage private citizens to assist the government in
the fight against fraud. Often the whistleblower faces
an uphill battle as large, powerful corporations or
individuals are usually named as defendants. An
experienced attorney in qui tam claims may help you gain
a percentage of stolen government funds.
Potential heroes that blow the whistle on
government fraud and corruption include employees, former
employees, high-level executives, sub contractors, general
contractors, and people working with major defense
contractors, telecommunications companies, and large health
care organizations.
If you are aware of a defense contractor,
highway contractor, large health care company, or other
large contractor or subcontractor that is defrauding the
United States Government out of millions or billions of
dollars, contact
Texas
Government Contractor Wage Fraud Whistleblower lawyer Jason Coomer. As a Texas
Government Contractor Wage Fraud Whistleblower Lawyer, he works with other powerful
Government Contractor Fraud Qui
Tam Lawyers that handle large governmental fraud cases.
He works with other Government Contractor Fraud Lawyers throughout the
nation to blow the whistle on fraud that hurts the United
States and our armed forces.