Texas Defense Contractor Fraud Whistleblower Lawyer: Large Financial Rewards Are Being Offered to Professionals Who Properly Expose Large Scale Defense Contractor Fraud by Texas Defense Contractor Fraud Whistleblower Lawyer Jason S. Coomer

Over five hundred billion dollars ($500,000,000,000.00) in defense contracts have been awarded to defense contractors in the state of Texas since 2002. Further, it is estimated that between fifty billion ($50,000,000,000.00) and a hundred billion ($100,000,000,000.00) were spent on fraudulent and inflated defense contracts. For this reason, the U.S. government offers large financial rewards to people with original knowledge of significant defense contractor fraud. More specifically, the government is offering rewards to individuals who expose the sale of defective weapons, vehicles, ammunition, technology, and equipment. Further, the government offers financial rewards to individuals who expose fraudulent false certifications of services performed or goods provided. These rewards encourage professionals with original knowledge of large scale government fraud to step forward to expose government fraud. The first step for many of these professionals is to obtain a confidential review of their potential case by a Texas Defense Contractor Fraud Whistleblower Lawyer to determine if their potential case may be a viable whistleblower reward case.

If you have original information of significant defense contractor fraud, please feel free to contact Texas Defense Contractor Fraud Whistleblower Lawyer, Jason Coomer, for a free online review of your potential Defense Contractor Fraud or Government Contractor Fraud Whistleblower Reward Lawsuit. If you prefer, please also feel free to also use our online submission form.

Whistleblower Reward Laws Offer Large Financial Rewards And Are The Most Effective Method For Identifying and Preventing Large Scale Fraud Against the Government

Whistleblower Reward Laws are the most effective method for identifying and preventing large scale fraud against the government, in financial markets, and in large corporations. New whistleblower reward laws have harnessed the power of economic incentives by offering large monetary rewards to whistleblowers that properly report significant fraud. These whistleblower recovery laws include Qui Tam Actions and Bounty Actions. Below is a discussion of Qui Tam False Claim Actions and provisions of the Act that show how the whistleblower seeking reward (relator) may qualify for compensation of up to 30% of any money recovered by the government from the original and specialized information provided by the whistleblower.

Texas Defense Contractor Fraud and False Certifications that Lead to False Claims Act Lawsuits

False certifications are a common way that government contractors defraud the United States Government and taxpayers out of large amounts of money. Many whistleblowers have been successful in blowing the whistle on fraudulent government contractors. These whistleblowers have exposed defense contractor fraud that put our troops in danger and building contractors that steal money from the United States. Under False Claims Act litigation billions of dollars are regained from these fraudulent government contractors and sub-contractors. Some common ways government contractors cheat the government are False Certification of Product Quality, Product Substitution, Cross Charging, False Certification of Services Provided, Charging for Services or Goods not provided, and Violations of the Truth-in-Negotiations Act ("TINA"), and Improper Cost Allocation.

Common Types of Defense Contractor Fraud and False Certifications that Lead to False Claims Act Lawsuits

False Certifications

False certifications are a common way that government contractors defraud the United States Government and taxpayers out of large amounts of money. Many whistleblowers have been successful in blowing the whistle on fraudulent government contractors. These whistleblowers have exposed defense contractor fraud that put our troops in danger and building contractors that steal money from the United States. Under False Claims Act litigation billions of dollars are regained from these fraudulent government contractors and sub-contractors. Some common ways government contractors cheat the government are False Certification of Product Quality, Product Substitution, Cross Charging, False Certification of Services Provided, Charging for Services or Goods not provided, and Violations of the Truth-in-Negotiations Act ("TINA"), and Improper Cost Allocation.

False Certification of Product Quality commonly occurs after a product has been approved for mass production. The original prototypes of a product are typically created with high quality materials and parts including strong metals, seals, plastics, and components. However, after the original prototypes have been tested and approved, some defense contractors use inferior parts and materials to lower costs that make weapons, ships, vehicles, computers, electronics, and other military goods less reliable, weaker, and more prone to not work when needed. The defense contractor that provides a false certification of a product's quality has committed a false certification that may subject the defense contractor to a False Certification of Product Quality False Claims Act Law Suit.

The Defense of Department often requires its contractors to build weapons systems in accordance with very detailed product specifications because quality and reliability are critical with weapons systems and other military equipment. Failure to comply with these specifications and falsely certifying that these specifications were met can cause death and place our troops in danger. As such it is extremely important that appropriate quality assurance steps are taken in building or producing weapons systems and other military equipment and that a defense contractor's certification of compliance with these specifications can be trusted.

Product Substitution False Claims

Similar to False Certification of Product Quality Qui Tam Claims are Product Substitution False Claims. These claims occur when a Defense Contractor that is under a government contract that specifies that the defense contractor build products using a certain grade, quality of parts, or materials & parts from American companies, fails to comply with the contract. These Defense Contractors often decide it is more profitable to use or substitute inferior parts or parts not made by American companies. Defense Contractors that use inferior parts or parts not made by American Companies as required by their government contract may be subject to a Product Substitution False Claim Act Law Suit.

Cross-Charging False Claims

Cross-Charging occurs when a Defense Contractor has a fixed-price contract, where the company receives a fixed price for a certain number of weapons no matter how much it costs to produce them and another that is a "cost-plus" contract, where the government pays the company for the cost of making the weapons, plus a percentage of its costs as a profit. In this circumstance the Defense Contractor has an economic incentive to charge the time it spends working on the fixed-price contract (where it gets paid the same no matter how much time it takes) to the cost-plus contract (where it gets paid for its costs plus profit). This may be accomplished by instructing employees to write down on their time cards that they worked on the cost-plus contract when they actually worked on the fixed-price contract. A Defense Contractor that charges fixed price work on a cost-plus contract is creating false claims or false certifications that may subject them to a Cross-Charging False Claims Act Law Suit.

Improper Cost Allocation False Claims

Improper cost allocation false claims are a more subtle version of the cross-charging scheme. In this type of false claim, a defense contractor with government contracts and private commercial contracts fails to spread or allocate their costs fairly among the different jobs. These types of false claims are typically more difficult to detect as the defense contract usually tries to hide the misallocation in indirect costs or bury the misallocations in hard to interpret records. These improper allocation false claims are more common in large contracts where the product has military uses and private uses such as with large aircraft companies. Defense Contractors that deliberately allocate a disproportionate share of indirect or overhead costs to the government for the purpose on increasing there profits may cause themselves to be subject to Improper Allocation False Claims Law Suits, if the correct whistle blower reports the fraud.

Truth In Negotiation Act Violation False Claims

When the government wants to purchase highly specialized weapons, military services, or other military equipment, it often is limited to one potential defense contractor because of the specialized need. This limited supply often creates monopoly power in the "sole-source supplier". This creates a problem in making sure that the sole-source supplier does not over charge the government for the good or services that it is supplying to the government. The Truth In Negotiation Act (TINA) requires the Defense Contractor to truthfully disclose all relevant information about its costs to the government in sole-source contract negotiations. Defense Contractors that submit false cost and pricing data to the Defense Department or failure of a sole-source Defense Contractor to provide accurate cost information to intentionally inflate costs to increase profits can cause liability for a violation of the Truth In Negotiation Act and result in a Truth In Negotiation Act Violation False Claims Act Law Suit.

History of Qui Tam Lawsuits and Defense Contractor Fraud Lawsuits

Defense Contractor lawsuits have existed for centuries as deceptive government contractors have been around as long as government contracting has. Qui tam actions allow private citizens to file a lawsuit on behalf of the U.S. government in an effort to recover losses caused by fraud against the government. This law is an incentive for civilians with specialized knowledge who know of individuals or companies making false claims for profit to come forward with information. In reward, the "whistleblower" (also known as the relator) shares in any federal revenue recovered.

For more on the history of Defense Contractor Fraud Lawsuits and Qui Tam Lawsuits, go to the following article on Qui Tam Claims.

Qui Tam Lawsuits and Defense Contractor Fraud Lawsuits

In 1986 as a result of increased government contractor fraud, Congress amended the False Claims Act in order to make it easier for whistleblowers to file claims against fraudulent corporations and individuals. The act also help protect the Whistleblower or Relator from retaliation.

The 1986 Amendment defines a "claim" as:

"...any request or demand which is made to a contractor, grantee, or other recipient if the United States Government provides any portion of the money or property which is requested or demanded, or if the government will reimburse such contractor, grantee, or other recipient for any portion of the money or property which is requested or demanded."

The whistleblower's share of recovery is a maximum of 30 percent and the government's prior knowledge of fraud now does not necessarily bar a whistleblower from collecting lost revenue. If the government took over the lawsuit, the relator can "continue as a party to the action." The defendant is also required to pay for the relator's attorney fees. The whistleblower is also protected from retaliatory actions by his or her employer. As a result or the amendment, qui tam lawsuits increased dramatically. Though the amendment was first made fore corrupt defense contractors, the amendment has uncovered billions of dollars in health care fraud.

Anyone who defrauds the government out of revenue can be held accountable under the False Claims Act. Common defendants include defense contractors, health care providers, other government contractors and subcontractors, state and local government agencies, and private universities. Whistleblowers often include current and former employees of the defrauding company, competitors of government contractors and public interest groups.

The False Claims Act was enacted to encourage private citizens to assist the government in the fight against fraud. Often the whistleblower faces an uphill battle as large, powerful corporations or individuals are usually named as defendants. An experienced attorney in qui tam claims may help you gain a percentage of stolen government funds.

Qui Tam Claims, False Claims Act, and Defense Contractor Fraud Lawsuits

There are several types of Qui Tam claims covered under the False Claims Act:

• Mischarging or overcharging for goods or services.
• Improper price data and the request for payment for services never provided.
• Holding government property for fraudulent purposes.
• Avoiding payment of a debt to the government because of illegal reasons.
• Knowingly providing the government with defective or dangerous products that were falsely certified.
• Falsely certifying information for the entitlement of benefits.
• Having any false claim paid by the government.

The mischarging case is the most common type of qui tam case filed. Mischarging cases generally involve filing false claims for goods or services that were not provided or delivered. A common mischarging scenario is employee labor charged to a government contract not worked on. Other common mischarging schemes are claims made to the Government for medical services not rendered or for services performed by an attending physician when the service was actually performed by a nurse or other provider that should have been billed at a lower rate.

Another type of case is the false negotiation or defective pricing case that involves the submission of false cost and pricing data to the Government. This scheme, which takes on many forms, involves the submission of false costs or pricing data to the Government during the negotiation of a contract that subsequently results in an inflated contract price.

Other common types of cases involve product and service substitution and false certification of entitlement for benefits. Examples of product and service substitution are falsely certifying that a product meets specifications, false testing schemes such as falsely certifying that reliability testing was conducted and providing an inferior service or product. Examples of false certification of entitlement cases are falsely certifying information for FHA mortgage guarantees and price supports.

Potential heroes that blow the whistle on government fraud and corruption include employees, former employees, high-level executives, sub contractors, general contractors, and people working with major defense contractors, telecommunications companies, and large health care organizations.

Texas Defense Contractor Fraud Whistleblower Reward Lawyer Works With Whistleblowers and Other Defense Contractor Fraud Whistleblower Lawyers Throughout the United States and the World

As a Texas Defense Contractor Fraud Whistleblower Lawyer, he works with whistleblowers from Texas, the United States and throughout the world. He also commonly works with other Defense Contractor Fraud Whistleblowers. If you are aware of a defense contractor or subcontractor who is defrauding the United States Government out of millions or billions of dollars, contact Texas Defense Contractor Fraud Whistleblower Lawyer Jason Coomer.